Jon Kennedy
Jon Kennedy


Jon Kennedy's 'Postcards from
the Nanty Glo in My Mind
'

A Jonal 'extra': Legislating morality

An acquaintance today resorted to that old canard, "you can't legislate morality," to justify voting for proabortion candidates and their platforms. I remember that misrepresentation of legislation and of morality as being popular during the civil rights movement of the Johnson and Nixon years, often invoked to oppose legal attempts to guarantee civil rights. Ironically, in those days it was a shibboleth of certain "conservative" opinion leaders, where now it is more likely to be uttered by liberals. But though it may have a ring of wisdom and truth, it wasn't true then and it isn't true now. Not only can morality, in the sense of principles of ethical behavior, be written into laws, every law and the entire concept of a society based on law exists to undergird and enforce morality. Moreover, enacting just laws has a reforming effect on societies, just as the passage of federal civil rights laws led, rather quickly, all things considered, to a completely new way of interacting between the races in states where civil rights previously were not recognized.

And if "you can't legislate morality" were true, it would be proof that the Judeo-Christian God is bogus, because He has been legislating morality since Genesis 2. But even though no intelligent citizen of a democratic republic like ours would argue that "biblical morality," or even "Judeo-Christian morality" ought to be legislated, every intelligent moral person will readily see that some morality must be legislated and, to whatever extent it can, should be enforced. And since all systems of morality, whether humanistic, "natural law," or what C.S. Lewis calls "the Tao," substantially overlap each other, any other system will work just as well as the biblcal or Judeo-Christian one. It's a universal "law," in the sense of a norm or principle of morality, that the murdering of innocent human life is immoral, and that is all one needs in order to see that abortion is wrong and should be restricted by laws.

Like every other moral principle, legislation against abortion cannot be enforced perfectly. Like every other law, it will be broken by some members of the society it's supposed to help, but as in every other law, as well, it will be effective in curbing some violations. And in this case that means it will stop some abortions and thus save some innocent human lives. And as prolifers always say, "one life saved is worth the effort" of conducting prolife campaigns. It's obvious to anyone who has looked at the data that "legalizing" abortion on demand as Roe v. Wade did in 1973 has led to millions of additional abortions. It's obvious that although there were many illegal abortions before the law was changed, there have been millions more of them since the change, and millions of lives could have been saved if abortion had been kept illegal.

Every law gets broken by some, but it's also true that every law is obeyed by some who respect law in general or fear the consequences of overstepping the bounds. One purpose of laws is to encourage good and pro-social behavior. Studies of women who have had abortions have found that a large portion of them were undertaken under pressure...the pregnant woman leaned toward having her baby, but pressure by a boyfriend or a mother (more often than not, the latter, in fact) persuaded her to make an end of her unfortunate predicament. Laws against abortion, even those partial measures like requiring parental notification in the case of minors and waiting a certain time before having the fatal procedure, help pregnant women resist such pressures and enable them to point out that the law is on their side, the side of life, as it should be.

The Roe v. Wade decision held, and the feminist movement has continued to hold ever since, that the pregnant woman's body is her own and that she cannot be forced by law to allow it to be used by "an invading presence," even her own unwanted baby. The opposite argument is that, just as in divorce cases the interest of the more vulnerable child than the more resourceful (one could even say, "more cunning") mother, the child's best interests should trump those of the parent. And in divorce proceedings, even the man involved is required to pay his share in pain and suffering to assure that the child, not he, be given first consideration. Every divorce hurts a child (even those which, in some ways, are in the child's best interest, which I readily admit is sometimes the case), but every abortion hurts a child infinitely more.

Why the double standard?

—Webmaster Jon Kennedy

 


 
 
Google
 

Search nantyglo.com
 Search web
Find a word



in Merriam-Webster's
online dictionary

 


The Nanty Glo Home Page and all its departments are for and by the whole Blacklick Valley community. Your feedback and written or artistic contributions, also notification about access problems, are welcomed. Click here to reply.

Suitable letters to the Home Page will be considered for publication in the Forum departments unless they are specifically labeled “Not for Publication.”

 

 

latest additions
to the Nanty Glo Home Page

C.S. Lewis resources page
Report on latest NTAMHS Meeting
Halloween parade video


Today's chuckle

Corporate communications: This gem is the closing paragraph of a nationally-circulated memo from a large communications company: "Lucent Technologies is endevorily determined to promote constant attention to current procedures of transacting business focusing emphasis on innovative ways to better, if not supersede, the expectations of quality."


Thought for today

Has this world been so kind to you that you should leave with regret? There are better things ahead than any we leave behind.

— C. S. Lewis (1898 - 1963)


Click to enlarge

Jon Kennedy's latest book is The Everything Guide to C.S. Lewis and Narnia, now in stores, from Adams Media, F&W Publications. From May 9, 2007 through July 2, 2008 his blog entries or "Jonals" were articles inspired by readings in Lewis's work that didn't fit into the book. Click here for a list of all articles in the C.S. Lewis Overflow series. The book is available for purchase in support of the Liberty Museum in Nanty Glo and is also available on Amazon.



Share and share alike!

Put your video clips on your home town home page, the Nanty Glo Home Page.* Just send them in an email to
webmaster@nantyglo.com.

Good subjects:
reunions
graduations
performances
school plays, programs
celebrations
holidays, trips
memorial videos
community news events
youth and club projects
fund-raisers
carnivals, fairs
homecomings
community improvements
sports events

local "color"

*The fine print: Offer limited to residents and former residents of the Blacklick Valley as indicated in the subdirectories at the bottom of this page. "G & PG-rated" content only, please.

 


 

Nanty Glo Home | Blacklick Township Page | Vintondale Page | Jackson Township Page