Jon Kennedy
Jon Kennedy


Jon Kennedy's 'Postcards from
the Nanty Glo in My Mind
'

Media mischief

Three incidences of mischief in the media got my attention last week.

Who was God talking to?

First, a standup comedian on Comedy Central did a very blasphemous (but not unusual, in these days) set in which he imagined God going on the Maury Povich Show to face charges that he was the father of Mary's baby. Though the setup was blasphemous on its face, I think any serious Christian would see that and react according to his or her own standard for dealing with public outrages against the faith. And any nominal "Christian" or unbeliever would shrug it off as not much different from most of what passes as comedy these days, and laugh along with the show's live audience. It's a novel idea, so maybe it's funny, by that way of thinking. But what I found "msichievous" in a sense worth discussing was a reference a bit later in his set in which the comedian referred to God saying "let us make light" as part of the creation narrative in Genesis. Then the comic continued: "Who was God talking to? Nobody else has been created yet."

This I think has more potential to become a stumblingblock to inquirers into Christianity and those on unstable grounding, because it has a ring of truth and a "gotcha" quality that might cause weak knees to wobble. Actually, the Bible doesn't quote God as saying, "let us make light"; it says "let there be light." It was not until He was about to create man and woman that God spoke to "someone" in terms of "let us": "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea..." Genesis 1:26. Of course orthodox Christians from earliest times since the founding of the church have used this passage as evidence of the eternal existence of God as a trinity, as one being of three persons.

One of the bedrock confessions of Christian faith is, "God is love" (1 John 4:8 and 16). And this is only meaningful, C.S. Lewis has said, if God is more than one person. In His eternal being, "before" there was any creation, anything apart from himself, how would "love," one of his defining characteristics, have meant anything if he were unitary, as Jewish and Islamic theology claim? The New Testament teaches that it was the second person of the Trinity, Christ the Son, who did the actual creating at the creation (Colossians 1:16-17). But even Jewish Bible scholars have an interpretation of Genesis 1:26 that answers the standup comedian's challenge: "God was speaking in the language of royalty; just as the King or Queen uses 'we' to refer to him- or herself, so was God using the 'royal we' in speaking of himself."

Really cheap grace

The second instance of media mischief I picked up from a commercial for a new "reality" show coming to CBS. Though I was tuning only one ear to the telly while keeping my eyes on the computer screen and keyboard, the commercial mentioned that one of the "real-life" characters in this new reality series is a teacher of Catholicism. I glanced up to catch a glimpse of the said "teacher," a young man without clerical garb, and from the little I heard he may be anything from a catechist helping out in his parish to a CYO leader to a Catholic high school teacher or even something more. But the attention grabber was the sound bite from him, which was approximately this: "The great thing about Catholicism is that you can do any terrible thing and then go to confession and confess it and then you're cleared, set to go again."

I'm in no position to know how widely held this teaching—or this idea—may be among Catholics, but having it said on network television in prime time by someone described as a teacher of Catholicism sets Catholicism back to pre-Vatican II days, I don't doubt, in the thinking of millions of members of other Christian communions and maybe even some Catholics. I remember that for years this was my own main critique of Catholicism, back in my teens and twenties, but I was told it was a sterotyping caricature of the Catholic approach to faith and the communion's teaching on the sacrament of confession. My reading in the Catholic Catechism tends to support this, yet my "anecdotal" exposure to the outworking of the Catholic view of confession generally seems to comport with the reality show "Catholic teacher's" summation of it in his throw-away quotation. Could it be that official Catholic teaching is that "confession" is only effective if it is accompanied by changed behavior (repentance) but that in unofficial Catholic practice "confession" is seen by most as an easy fix to any sins, a fix that can be applied every Saturday while returning to the sinful practices of Monday through Friday as a way of living? I'd welcome some robust dialog on this perplexing issue.

And again, this is not to attack anyone's religion but rather to, as Solomon says in the proverbs, sharpen their metal to better cut it.

Pseudoscience

The third instance of media mischief may actually rise above the mischief level to a frontal, albeit sophomoric, attack on Christianity on the part of the media playing it. Last week major newspapers fell over each other to proclaim the latest "archaeological finding" (I put it in quotation marks because even those so quick to brandish it as a bludgeon over the back of Chistianity had no idea whether it is authentic or not) that they believe may totally undermine Christian faith. It is a Jewish text tentatively dated as "slightly before the time of Christ" which says a messiah is being expected to arrive who will die and rise again. This, the media holler, proves that Jesus's teaching of his resurrection was not original.

The spoiler of the "objective media's" fun, of course, is the fact, known to anyone who has been "properly catechised" or even taught in a half-decent history course), that Jesus and the church have never claimed that his dying and being resurrected was an original idea. In fact, the New Testament is chockablock with citations of Old Testament prophecies aimed at supporting just that sequence of events as well as many other unique aspects of Jesus' birth and life. In fact, the most basic and universal creed of Christendom, the Nicene Creed (381 A.D.), declares "on the third day He rose again, according to the scriptures." "Scriptures" here is referring to the Old Testament, the last book of which had been written hundreds of years before the birth of Jesus, not the New Testament.

Stick this clipping into the same pigeonhole you've put the National Geographic's million dollar idea of a couple of Easters ago that a "new" Gospel of Judas gives eveidence that Judas was secretly working for, rather than against, Jesus (that "just-found" so-called Gospel had been familiar to the Church for nearly 2000 years, and known to any scholar of the Gnostic Gospels as no more authentic as history than the Protocols of the Elders of Zion). Chuck it where you've put the break-through news a few months ago that Jesus walked on ice, not water, and uncounted other attempts of science so-called to undermine faith.

And though it's been years since I last preached a sermon, I can still mount my high horse occasionally. ;- )

—Webmaster Jon Kennedy


 

 
 
Google
 

Search nantyglo.com
 Search web
Find a word



in Merriam-Webster's
online dictionary

 

 

latest additions
to the Nanty Glo Home Page

C.S. Lewis resources page
Report on latest NTAMHS Meeting
New video


Today's chuckle

I have just two superstitions. One, don't call someone a bad name if they have a loaded pistol. Two, don't call your girl friend Tina if her name is Vivian.

— George Underwood, former NBA basketball player


Thought for today

ON COURSES ON THE BIBLE AS LITERATURE: "Those who read the Bible as literature do no read the Bible.... Unless the religious claims of the Bible are again acknowledged, its literary claims will, I think, be given only 'mouth honor' and that decreasingly."

— C. S. Lewis (1898 - 1963)


The Nanty Glo Home Page and all its departments are for and by the whole Blacklick Valley community. Your feedback and written or artistic contributions, also notification about access problems, are welcomed. Click here to reply.

Suitable letters to the Home Page will be considered for publication in the Forum departments unless they are specifically labeled “Not for Publication.”


Click to enlarge

Jon Kennedy's latest book is The Everything Guide to C.S. Lewis and Narnia, now in stores, from Adams Media, F&W Publications. From May 9, 2007 through July 2, 2008 his blog entries or "Jonals" were articles inspired by readings in Lewis's work that didn't fit into the book. Click here for a list of all articles in the C.S. Lewis Overflow series. The book is available for purchase in support of the Liberty Museum in Nanty Glo and is also available on Amazon.



Share and share alike!

Put your video clips on your home town home page, the Nanty Glo Home Page.* Just send them in an email to
webmaster@nantyglo.com.

Good subjects:
reunions
graduations
performances
school plays, programs
celebrations
holidays, trips
memorial videos
community news events
youth and club projects
fund-raisers
carnivals, fairs
homecomings
community improvements
sports events

local "color"

*The fine print: Offer limited to residents and former residents of the Blacklick Valley as indicated in the subdirectories at the bottom of this page. "G & PG-rated" content only, please.

 


 

Nanty Glo Home | Blacklick Township Page | Vintondale Page | Jackson Township Page