|
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Mere Christianity
At the risk of losing some readers with the
subject line, I'm again turning to my current reading, along with the
concluding thought in yesterday's entry, for a little inspiration on
a day when the creative well seems dried out by the unrelenting summer
solstice sun. Yesterday's concluding thought was, "But if penury (poverty)
is a habit so hard to break, why isn't also faith, as well, engrained
and why is rejoicing not a learned and even unshakeable personality
trait?" And my current reading is a little gem of a volume, Pleasures
Forevermore, the Theology of C.S. Lewis, by John Randolph Willis, S.J.
I admit to throwing in the
concluding question on yesterday's entry as almost an afterthought
in a bald attempt to try to "redeem" a tepid discourse about a very
personal reflection on my travel plans and how they became cast in
concrete. It may be patriotism, not religion, that is the last refuge
of scoundrels, but some may wonder if I'm retreating to religion in
excursions like yesterday's.
However, if you've paid attention you know I spent most of my adult
career as a youth and campus minister and it may be allowed that although
circumstances beyond my control have taken the valley boy out of the
ministry, nothing can get "the ministry" out of the boy ("old
boy" more aptly). On the one hand, I believe ultimate concerns in
life (which is how I define "religion") do have a place in the public
forum and shouldn't be ruled off limits for polite discussion. But
on the other hand it seems manifest that "religion" scares people
off; at the very least, if I'm talking about it, it's my religion,
not your's, that I'm talking about, so why should you care to read
about it?
Which leads to my current reading. C. S. Lewis, the subject of the
book and my favorite author, is widely beloved by serious Christians
and people of goodwill of other faiths as probably the most influential
"religious" thinker of the 20th century who was not a professional
religionist: no member of the clergy, theologian, or religious studies
teacher, but an everyday layman. He was a professor of a "secular"
subject (medieval and classical literature) in the English-speaking
world's premiere university, Oxford, and by church membership an Anglican
(the Church of England or, as known on this side of the pond, Protestant
Episcopalian).
Willis, a Roman Catholic priest and Jesuit professor of history
at Boston College, claims that his book is the first
Catholic study of Lewis's theology. But as such, it's not surprising
to Lewis admirers that the study is very appreciative of its subject's
thought and influence. It's often said, only half in jest, that reading
Lewis is the one issue that American evangelicals, Anglicans, Catholics,
and Eastern Orthodox alike enthusiastically endorse.
Lewis's books range from a series of novels aimed at children but
much loved by their parents, too, the Tales of Narnia; a science fiction
trilogy; several other works of fiction (The Screwtape Letters,
The Great Divorce, Until We Have Faces) and many nonfiction books,
mostly about Christianity, its doctrines and practice.
Among the latter, probably the most influential volume and the one
most appreciated by the wide spectrum described above, is Mere
Christianity, in which Lewis argues for the large body of teachings
all serious (as opposed to nominal or in-name-only) Christians share.
It's his masterpiece of Christian doctrine, intended to forge bonds
among post-World War II members of Anglican, Catholic, and evangelical
denominations in England and, by extension, the world beyond. And
by and large it succeeded and continues succeeding.
Today's postcard is full so I'll wrap this up tomorrow. But my point,
lest you miss tomorrow's post, is that when we do turn to "religion
talk" here on the Jonal, it's to the broadest yet meaningful sense
of the word "Christian" and not any in-group, sectarian, arcane, or
denominational understanding.
|
||||
|
Webmaster
Jon Kennedy
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
English language reform
David
L. Bickley sends along a plan to improve the English language.
The European Commission has just announced
an agreement whereby English will be the official language of the
EU rather than German which was the other possibility. As part of
the negotiations, Her Majesty's Government conceded that English spelling
had some room for improvement and has accepted a 5 year phase-in plan
that would be known as "Euro-English." In the first year, "s" will replace the
soft "c." Sertainly, this will make the sivil servants jump with joy.
The hard "c" will be dropped in favour of the "k." This would
klear up konfusion and keyboards kan have 1 less letter. There will be growing publik enthusiasm
in the sekond year, when the troublesome "ph" will be replaced with
"f." This will make words like "fotograf" 20 percent shorter. In the third year, publik akseptanse of
the new spelling kan be ekspekted to reach the stage where more komplikated
changes are possible. Governments will enkorage the removal of double
letters, which have always ben a deterent to akurate speling. Also,
al wil agre that the horible mes of the silent "e"s in the language
is disgraseful, and they should go away. By the fourth year, peopl
wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing "th" with "z" and "w" with
"v". During ze fifz year, ze unesesary "o" kan be dropd from vords
kontaining "ou" and similar changes vud of kors be aplid to ozer kombinations
of leters. After zis fifz yer, ve vil hav a reli
sensibl riten styl. Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and evrivon
vil find it ezi to understand ech ozer. Ze drem vil finali kum tru! |
||||
|
Sent
by Alice Pruit
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Selected
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
The
Nanty Glo Home Page and all its departments are for and by the whole
Blacklick Valley community. Your feedback and written or artistic
contributions, also notification about access problems, are welcomed.
Click here to reply.
|
||||
|
When subscribing
or unsubscribing to the list, use the email address to which you
receive mail. |
||||